11 September 2013

Gardens of the Moon – Steven Erikson

Gardens of the Moon (The Malazan Book of the Fallen, #1)In looking for something to read whilst on holiday I searched for the ’10 best fantasy series’ and came across a list entitled 10 fantasy series to read while waiting for George R. R. Martin. The list gave me confidence because at the very top of the list was the Kingkiller Chronicles; a series which although incomplete has entrenched itself firmly in my heart.

So I read the list and I found five series which appealed to my sense of taste, some of which weren’t yet complete. Others, apparently, were, although there are too many cases of authors going back to series and adding to them for this necessarily to hold true. Coming top of this list, from my perspective, was Steven Erikson’s Malazan book of the fallen series. It was complete, always nice when you’re planning on reading the books back to back, and it was long, something which generally holds appeal for me since it gives me a chance to know the characters. So with no further ado I purchased the entire ten books for my kindle, all the while wondering if this was in actual fact a good investment of my money.

Book one, Gardens of the the Moon, was brilliant. Erikson span several threads which started out wholly unconnected but progressively ran closer together. From that reasoning alone this book could be compared to a work by Martin. Not only that but he has no compunctions about killing off major, even central, characters to the story. More than one character I held great belief, was killed during the course of this book, although with the nature of true fantasy there are illusions that a characters death will necessarily stick.

And that is where the book differs greatly from Martin’s. In ‘A Song of Ice and Fire’ the magic is a subtle, almost non-existent, undercurrent to the main story. In Malazan book of the fallen the story would not progress without it. In many ways it is a story of how a game of the gods affects their mortal pawns.

The biggest issue I had with this book was how the first few chapters jumped from time to character and I struggled to find a foothold. Once it had settled down however pure brilliance emerged. It rang true as well to the preface the author had written seven books on, He said something to the effect of either a reader will not like my style and I will lose them in the first third of the first book or they will be fully on board and riding the waves with me seven books later.

I’m glad I persevered, the story is worth it.

Rowen 

9 September 2013

10 Things I didn't Realise before spending a Fortnight in Porto Santo

  1. An island about the same size as my home town could have a desert.
  2. Places really do exist where you can see the sea-bed through metres of water.
  3. Skeleton crosswords aren’t as hard as they sound, it’s just a case of doing the beginning right.
  4. A place would put roundabouts in just for the excuse of ‘planting gardens in the road’.
  5. I would feel uncomfortable having someone come and make my bed – I tried making it myself once but she just unmade it.
  6. That it would feel depressing to come somewhere that I expected to be warm and sunny and to find some heat, but mostly a lot of cloud and wind. Fortunately it cleared up towards the end of the holiday.
  7. A place still exists where crime is virtually non-existant. Ever seen ‘The Bozeman Reaction’? Sheldon would love it here!
  8. It could take me soooo long to read a book I’m enjoying. Seriously around 12 hours a day for around 5 or 6 days, that’s a long time for me to be reading a book on holiday.
  9. King Kong really does exist, he’s swimming in the sea just off shore.
  10. I have a boyfriend who will willingly and actively eat fruit. Who knew?!




Rowen

6 September 2013

Bedknob and Broomstick – Mary Norton

Bedknob and Broomstick is I guess a fairly classic children’s story. Pretty much everyone’s heard of it and some have seen the film. Personally I always thought that both words were plurals but having read the book it makes a lot more sense that they’re not.

It is the story of three children who’re sent to stay with their elderly aunt for the summer. While there one of them notices Ms Price crashing a broomstick. This turns into a spiral of adventure for them involving trips to unchartered territory and visits to the past.

I can’t help but wonder if Dr Who originally had a basis linking it to this book because there’re a lot of similarities between the enchanted bedknob and the TARDIS.

All in all it’s a good story which has a a number of morals but also a slight thrill factor. I think it would appeal to preteens if it wasn’t written in a way which has dated.

Rowen

4 September 2013

His Casual Vacancy – J.K.Rowling


His Casual Vacancy I have mixed opinions on. I pre-ordered a copy of it, at least in part because it halved the cost of the book, but also because I, like everyone else, wanted to know what J K Rowling had managed to come up with next. I was very much a part of the ‘Potter-generation’, Harry Potter and the Philosophers stone was the first ‘real’ book I ever read, and a friend commented that the release of the final film was like the end of our childhood.


Having brought it home it sat on my bookcase untouched for a couple of months. I couldn’t quite bring myself to read it, what if it didn’t live up to my expectations? Quite honestly I can say that it didn’t, I don’t know what my expectations were but it didn’t meet them. I can’t help but feel this has more to do with a cultural attitude towards J K Rowling and Harry Potter than it does to do with the book itself.

When I first finished the book I would have told you don’t read it, it’s a waste of your time. I found a lot of the characters unlikeable, I thought she’d downplayed some pretty major themes. And there were some moments within, reminiscent of the later Harry Potter books, which were frankly cringe worthy, the sex scenes.

These scenes made sense within the context of the book as a whole and yet the writing style which delivered them brought me back overwhelmingly to Hogwarts and Childhood innocence.
Having read this far you would be entitled to assume I had only negative reactions to the book. This isn’t true. I found it a breeze to read, quite happily sitting down and losing hours to it. The ending was fantastic, there weren’t any fireworks but it certainly made me stop and think. It made me cry…

And this brings me back to my mixed opinions. Several months after reading this book it has stayed with me, whilst my brain has lost hold of stories which amazed me while I was reading them. I’ll be doing any number of things and my thoughts will dart back to this book and the situations its characters faced. By downplaying the heavy stuff J K Rowling has ensured that it is ever present in my mind. That I find pretty cool.

Would I recommend that you read this book? I still don’t know. I would certainly say don’t rush out and buy a brand new copy, as you can probably find any number of them abandoned in charity shops. At the same time though I no longer feel that by reading it you’d be wasting your time.

In view of this I’m glad I had time to reflect before I wrote my review.

Rowen

2 September 2013

Forever in Blue - Ann Brashares

Forever in Blue, was, for me not the best of the 'Sisterhood' books. I didn't really like the story for any of the girls. 

Lena moves on emotionally from Kostos and while this is, in theory at least, a good thing you can't help but think 'No No No, they have to make it work somehow'. Then just as you come to terms with the fact that Lena is over him, he turns up with the astounding news that he divorced his wife because she lied to him and was never really pregnant. This comes just as you think Lena has sorted herself out and he throws her back into turmoil, the only good thing about this train is that by the end of the book Lena has at least come to terms with everything and is able to move on.

Tibby finds herself in the middle of a pregnancy scare and  pushes away nearly everyone who cares about her, including Brian, who cares about her more than anything. When she tells him she wants to end it and effectively grants Effie free reign to be with him she's devastated. She becomes self-absorbed and can't see the irony of her own actions as jealousy rears it's ugly head. Once again there is only one good thing about this story thread which is that when Brian and Tibby reunite at least it mollifies some of the guilt you feel at Brian having his heart broken. 

Bridget, I don't even know what happened with Bridget. She is in a happy, stable and thriving relationship with her first and only love and yet she goes to another country and while there kisses a married man. This for me sums up the craziness of this book compared with the others. 

Meanwhile Carmen you just wouldn't recognise, it's like she had a personality transplant. After one year without her friends she is no longer outgoing and bubbly, but shy and introverted. It's ironic considering they all went to different schools so it's not actually like she's never had to make friends before.

As you may be able to tell I didn't really like this book. Personally I think that Ann Brashares would have been better to have left the story at Book Three and just rounded off Lena's story a little better. The sisterhood didn't work once they were apart and the characters changed too much. 

Rowen

For related Posts:

Last Night I saw the most Beautiful Sunset

I just wanted to let you all know about this most beautiful sunset....


.... And I wanted to let you know that although I've been missing for the past 8 months or so I've been thinking of you, I've got a few posts scheduled so I'm back....

... At least for the next couple of weeks or so.

Rowen

27 June 2013

Sisterhood Everlasting – Ann Brashares

In ‘Sisterhood Everlasting’ the girls seemed generally lost. At the end of ‘Forever in Blue’ I felt that Ann Brashares had tied up most of her loose ends pretty neatly. Bee and Tibby were both experiencing their happily ever afters, however little I felt their actions deserved it. Carmen had discovered her true desire in life and her ability to act on it. And Lena, my most favourite Lena, had discovered an inner strength to be her own person.
Sisterhood Everlasting’ is set 10 years on and so much has changed. Carmen is living her dream, but her dream has turned stale, and to be honest this was one of the few parts of the book that I actually bought. It’s easy to see Carmen getting so swept up in the world of Celebrities, which she’d always admired at a distance, that she lost contact with her friends, and herself, in the process.

 I liked her ‘redemption’ it was cleverly done, but I’m not sure how realistic a two day train journey without any stops is. Having never travelled in a country as large as the US I’ll let it slide and ignore the fact that most train journeys I take have stops every 5 minutes, maybe one day I’ll take that journey for myself.  It amused me to see her all too obvious addiction to technology, as she suffered withdrawal symptoms, and was glad to see her return to her former self by the end of the book.

Lena was the reverse. Rather than move forwards in the 10 year gap it’s almost as though she chose to isolate herself and internally regress. She dwells on Kostos almost constantly, despite the fact that she’d received closure in the previous book. It’s altogether unsurprising to find them reconciled by the end, and while it’s something I wanted, I can’t help but feel that they left it too long and had too large a gap to bridge. None the less they seemed happy and that satisfied me.

Bee meanwhile had quite simply paused. She had remained in the same state of inertia for the whole 10 years. In the words of Newton ‘an object in a state of uniform motion will remain in that same state of motion until an external force is applied’. In the case of Bee this external force was the events in Greece at the start of the book which propelled her into a journey of self-discovery.

I was not happy with Bee’s story. I didn’t like that she pushed Eric away, although I get where that came from. I didn’t like that she contemplated an abortion, it seemed absurdly out of character, I’m not saying no character ever should, but it just wasn’t the sort of thing that Bee would do in my opinion. But most of all I didn’t like how easily Eric took her back. She’d been gone for six months! She’d taken off without so much as a goodbye and hadn’t once contacted him. In fact she’d gone out of her way to make herself un-contactable. I know  that no matter how much I loved someone if they did that to me I’d be furious, and they wouldn’t get off as lightly as she did, there would be yelling and tears, the whole shebang, they certainly wouldn’t be able to crook their little finger and have me come running. I get that he was relieved she was safe, but it was pretty much a parody of the lost son parable.

And finally Tibby. I cried so many tears over Tibby’s story. I’m still not sure I understand how she could have a two year old daughter and not have mentioned her to her parents. I’m glad she called her Bailey, it just made sense.

And yet as the invisible driving force of the group I’m not sure why it was Tibby who had to go. Her and Brian have already suffered so much that they deserved for their happiness to just go on. I didn’t like the way that Brashares wrote her death. The way that right until the end she tried to convince you of suicide. Tibby was much too strong for that, it didn’t make sense.

I did like Brian’s reaction to her death.  The way that he wouldn’t, and perhaps couldn’t, open up to Bee for a long time. I liked the fact that he resented her, it seemed realistic, and I’m glad of it. One thing which did strike me as odd was that he mentioned that it was Tibby who’d wanted Children and that he didn’t know how to do this. He’d been caring for her younger siblings since they first met, and after the great pregnancy scare of book 4, it was he who was convinced they could make it work, her who’d pushed him away.

This book was worth reading, but the characters had often changed in ways I wouldn’t have suspected and didn’t overly like.